Right to explanation and contestation

https://taxonomy.eticas.ai/risk/right-to-explanation-contestation

Maturity: established

The risk that affected individuals are not informed about decisions taken with AI assistance, do not receive a meaningful explanation of those decisions, or have no effective channel to challenge or appeal them. Includes obligations under GDPR Article 22 (rights regarding automated individual decision-making) and EU AI Act Article 13 (transparency and provision of information to deployers and affected persons).

Also known as: Right to explanation · Right to contest · Absence of appeal mechanisms · Ineffective communication with affected parties

System type: Automated decision-making (ADM) systems
Lifecycle stages: Post Processing

Mappings to external frameworks

Standards & frameworks

Framework Reference
EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 86 — Right to explanation of individual decision-making
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 — AI Management System External reporting + A.8.4 Communication of incidents
AIUC-1 — AI Underwriting Company Standard Implement AI disclosure mechanisms
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI 100-1) Accountable & Transparent (Govern 1.5; Manage 4.3)
OECD AI Principles Transparency and explainability (challenge mechanisms)

Taxonomies & vocabularies

Framework Reference
W3C Data Privacy Vocabulary — AI Extension Right to Explanation (DPV core / GDPR extension)
AIR 2024 Fundamental Rights → Violating Specific Types of Rights